I guess architecture sofware is not a priority for Autodesk like they say. It is not a joy to use like I think some other software seems greener on the other side like Fusion360. The cad and inters had to bear the burden of learning and using it anyway. They only changed from Autocad to Revit because they somehow bought the marketing and had the impression that all other firms were buying it. I think as professionals we (or they) have a heard mentality. This is some remodel work I'm doing on my garage all in Fusion360 direct modeling. Now I have used Fusion to do some small architectural type of projects, I tend to use the direct modeling mode (not capturing design history) because it gives me a lot more freedom for modeling and placing and editing my components without the structural overhead that parametric modeling has. There's is certainly good uses of Fusion supplementing design details for an architectural project, but you really should look at Autodesk Revit as it is widely used in the architectural and construction field.

If you are looking to learn a tool specifically for your professional development in the field of architectural design, Fusion probably isn't the tool to focus on. So the tools we provide are really more tailored towards designs that are going to be machined, or 3D printed or some form of mass production/manufacturing. Fusion is really targeted at more traditional product design and mechanical design workflows.

Vray fusion 360